Empirical studies show arbitration is a fairer, faster, and less expensive way for employees and consumers to resolve conflicts than costly and time-consuming courtroom litigation. But it is continuously under attack from plaintiffs’ lawyers who benefit the most from lawsuits. ILR fights to preserve arbitration at the federal and state levels.

Arbitration: Fairer, Faster, and Better for Employees

When it comes to solving disputes between employees and their employer, money doesn’t matter, and time isn’t precious. Or at least, that’s what opponents of employment arbitration would like you to…

ILR Research Review, Volume 6, Issue 2
Fairer, Faster, Better: An Empirical Assessment of Employment Arbitration
Arbitration Survey | March 7-11, 2019
The Trial Lawyer Underground: Covertly Lobbying the Executive Branch
Letter to CFPB Regarding Arbitration Study
Due to the clear advantages of arbitration over litigation in any number of situations, and the need to preserve this important dispute resolution process, ILR has established the Coalition to Preserve Arbitration. The Coalition’s membership is varied and broad. AT&T is one member of the Coalition and has provided legal and technical support on an in-kind basis in connection with our arbitration-related activities. This disclosure is being made to comply with the requirements of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as amended by the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007.
We use cookies to make your experience better:
View Our Privacy Policy