fbpx

Arbitration

Empirical studies show arbitration is a fairer, faster, and less expensive way for employees and consumers to resolve conflicts than costly and time-consuming courtroom litigation. But it is continuously under attack from plaintiffs’ lawyers who benefit the most from lawsuits. ILR fights to preserve arbitration at the federal and state levels.

Blogs

Post Cropped Graphic Post Cropped Graphic

The Top Five Cause For Action Podcast Episodes

Read More

Coalition Letter on H.R. 963, the “FAIR Act”

Read More

New Study: Consumers and Employees Win More Money, More Often, and More Quickly in Arbitration Than in Court

Read More

Experts

Matt Webb Matt Webb
Matt Webb
Senior Vice President, Legal Reform Policy

Reports

Spring 2022 Research Review Spring 2022 Research Review

Spring 2022 | ILR Research Review | Volume 9, Issue 1

Fairer, Faster, Better III: An Empirical Assessment of Consumer and Employment Arbitration

Private Antitrust Remedies: An Argument Against Further Stacking the Deck

Podcasts

EPISODE 22: Summit XXI: New Day, New Tactics: The Plaintiffs’ Bar at Work

Listen Now

Due to the clear advantages of arbitration over litigation in any number of situations, and the need to preserve this important dispute resolution process, ILR has established the Coalition to Preserve Arbitration. The Coalition’s membership is varied and broad. AT&T is one member of the Coalition and has provided legal and technical support on an in-kind basis in connection with our arbitration-related activities. This disclosure is being made to comply with the requirements of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as amended by the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007.