fbpx

Arbitration

Empirical studies show arbitration is a fairer, faster, and less expensive way for employees and consumers to resolve conflicts than costly and time-consuming courtroom litigation. But it is continuously under attack from plaintiffs’ lawyers who benefit the most from lawsuits. ILR fights to preserve arbitration at the federal and state levels.

watermark logo
New Study: Consumers and Employees Win More Money, More Often, and More Quickly in Arbitration Than in Court

Washington, D.C.—A new study released today by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform found that consumers and employees win more money, more often, and more quickly through…

Feature
Research
Spring 2022 Research Review Spring 2022 | ILR Research Review | Volume 9, Issue 1
Fairer, Faster, Better III: An Empirical Assessment of Consumer and Employment Arbitration
Private Antitrust Remedies: An Argument Against Further Stacking the Deck
Winter 2020 | ILR Research Review | Volume 7, Issue 2
Fairer, Faster, Better II: An Empirical Assessment of Consumer Arbitration
View All
Due to the clear advantages of arbitration over litigation in any number of situations, and the need to preserve this important dispute resolution process, ILR has established the Coalition to Preserve Arbitration. The Coalition’s membership is varied and broad. AT&T is one member of the Coalition and has provided legal and technical support on an in-kind basis in connection with our arbitration-related activities. This disclosure is being made to comply with the requirements of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995, as amended by the Honest Leadership and Open Government Act of 2007.

Cookie Notice

By clicking “I Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.

Cookie Notice

By clicking “I Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. Review Settings