Blogs
Reports
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/929c2/929c25ac9a0a95916215a1b497cbaaa65f976689" alt="Cover image for Volume 10, Issue 1 of the ILR Research review. Stylized blue logo and text."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe11e/fe11ebac0f6290a2cf86f70755541e56ecf17279" alt="Cover image for Volume 10, Issue 1 of the ILR Research review. Stylized blue logo and text."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2763d/2763d926a8cec3d216ead1cee9c2665f5a624a8a" alt="Cover of ILR's research paper, Mass Arbitration Shakedown: Coercing Unjustified Settlements"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/55f4e/55f4e2de6679a01e3db9e5e8a097a9286e03472f" alt="Cover of ILR's research paper, Mass Arbitration Shakedown: Coercing Unjustified Settlements"
Historically, multidistrict litigation proceedings (MDLs) were an efficient way of handling the pretrial phase of large numbers of similar lawsuits. Now, plaintiffs’ lawyers are using MDLs to litigate questionable or meritless claims hoping that the sheer number of cases will pressure defendants to settle. Reform is needed to avoid baseless proceedings.