June 17, 2016

WSJ Editorializes on the “Seedy” Collusion Between Plaintiffs Bar and Prosecutors

“A seedy side of American law is the widespread collusion between the plaintiffs bar and government prosecutors, who trade contingency-fee lawsuits for campaign contributions,” writes the Wall Street Journal editorial board.

The Journal takes note of a case in Hunt County, Texas, in which a resident (Kirk Grady) has filed a federal lawsuit against the county’s outsourcing of “its enforcement power” to a private contingency-fee plaintiffs’ attorney over Grady’s allegedly illegal storage of a wood pile on his property.

“When government makes the trial bar a business partner, the incentive shifts to bringing suits that offer the biggest potential settlements or verdicts,” notes the editorial. “The goal becomes the private payday, not justice in the public interest. This trial lawyer-government business model is widespread, so Mr. Grady’s suit is one to watch.”

Blog We Need The Rule of Law, Not Rule of PowerPoint Over-Enforcement News Opinion: “Walmart’s Opioid Whipsaw” Mass Tort Multidistrict Litigation News Attorney Ads Are Driving Paragard IUD Cases Class Action Litigation, Mass Tort Multidistrict Litigation, Trial Lawyer Advertising News In The News Today- Oct. 28, 2020 Class Action Litigation News Australia Securities Class Action Trial Results in Defense Verdict International Initiatives, Securities Litigation Reform
We use cookies to make your experience better:
View Our Privacy Policy