fbpx
News
December 7, 2016

Supreme Court Rules Violation of FCA’s Secrecy Requirement Does Not Lead to Dismissal of Case

In a unanimous ruling yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court said that violating the federal False Claims Act’s (FCA) secrecy requirement does not automatically mean a complaint should be dismissed.

The ruling upheld a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, who in 2015 choose not to dismiss a whistleblower complaint against State Farm, even though “a lawyer for the whistleblowers violated the seal requirement in alerting news outlets to the existence of the then-sealed complaint,” reports the National Law Journal.

The Supreme Court’s ruling noted that, “remedial tools like monetary penalties or attorney discipline remain available to punish and deter seal violations even when dismissal is not appropriate.” 

Supreme Court Qui Tam Action Blog Supreme Court to Review Qui Tam Action Dismissal Standards  False Claims Act (FCA) Blog Law 360 Expert Analysis: "False Claims Act Proposal Is Unfair And Would Hinder Economic Growth" False Claims Act (FCA) U.S. Department of Justice building in Washington D.C. News Reuters "Has An Investor-Backed FCA Whistleblower Reached The End of the Road?" False Claims Act (FCA) U.S. Department of Justice building in Washington D.C. Blog Flying Blind: Secret Funding in Government Lawsuits and What to Do About It False Claims Act (FCA), Third Party Litigation Funding (TPLF) News On Appeal, Justice Dept. Prevails In Bid To Dismiss Pharma Fraud Case False Claims Act (FCA)

Cookie Notice

By clicking “I Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.

Cookie Notice

By clicking “I Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. Review Settings