fbpx
News
May 27, 2015

Supreme Court Issues Split Decision on Whistle-Blower FCA Cases

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday issued a split decision on two issues regarding the scope of liability under the False Claims Act (FCA).

The first issue regards the statute of limitations under the FCA during wartime. On this issue, the Court held unanimously that a suit charging KBR Inc. and Halliburton Company of fraudulent billing had been filed too late, despite a whistle-blower’s attempt to invoke a federal law that suspends deadlines during wartime.

On the second issue, concerning the FCA’s so-called “first to file” bar, the Court unanimously held that plaintiffs may file FCA claims even after a pending claim has been dismissed or settled.

Read the full story here.

Supreme Court Qui Tam Action Blog Supreme Court to Review Qui Tam Action Dismissal Standards  False Claims Act (FCA) Blog Law 360 Expert Analysis: "False Claims Act Proposal Is Unfair And Would Hinder Economic Growth" False Claims Act (FCA) U.S. Department of Justice building in Washington D.C. News Reuters "Has An Investor-Backed FCA Whistleblower Reached The End of the Road?" False Claims Act (FCA) U.S. Department of Justice building in Washington D.C. Blog Flying Blind: Secret Funding in Government Lawsuits and What to Do About It False Claims Act (FCA), Third Party Litigation Funding (TPLF) News On Appeal, Justice Dept. Prevails In Bid To Dismiss Pharma Fraud Case False Claims Act (FCA)

Cookie Notice

By clicking “I Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.

Cookie Notice

By clicking “I Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. Review Settings