fbpx
News
October 22, 2019

Securities Plaintiffs’ Lawyers Try To Defend “Racket”

A group of plaintiffs’ lawyers filed a brief before the Seventh Circuit to defend a practice that some judges have called a “racket,” Alison Frankel reports in Reuters.

The brief defended the concept of “mootness fees,” which plaintiffs’ lawyers receive in merger-related securities litigation from defendants in exchange for voluntarily dismissing a lawsuit over disclosures. One judge called this a “racket,” in part because the lawyers received money while the class members received documents of little value. D&O Diary author Kevin LaCroix said these lawsuits only “provide a pretext for the plaintiffs’ lawyers to extract a fee, which the defendants pay just to make the plaintiffs’ lawyers go away.”

The plaintiffs’ lawyers, though, say these fees are outside the purview of judges.

Podcasts Episode 18: Why Federal Securities Suits Don’t Belong in State Court Securities Litigation Reform Stock data News D&O Diary Looks At 2021 Litigation Trends Securities Litigation Reform News D&O Diary Blog Calls For Congress To Take Up Securities Reforms Proposed In New ILR Briefly Securities Litigation Reform Blog D&O Diary: "Institute for Legal Reform: Congress Should Enact Reforms to Address Cyan" Securities Litigation Reform News In The News-August 16, 2021 Securities Litigation Reform

Cookie Notice

By clicking “I Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts.

Cookie Notice

By clicking “I Accept”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. Review Settings