News
February 12, 2020

“High Court May Interpret TCPA Autodial Rules Narrowly”

Two Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) defense attorneys with the Squire Patton Boggs law firm say the U.S. Supreme Court “may kill the plaintiffs bar’s golden goose.”

The case, American Association of Political Consultants Inc. et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al., will determine whether content-based exemptions under the TCPA are constitutional under free speech principles. Eric Troutman and Daniel Delnero say “the only way the TCPA is consistent with First Amendment principles is if the autodialer restrictions are read very narrowly,” much like a recent Eleventh Circuit decision. Doing so would “simultaneously save both the statute — and our free-speech rights.”

News "How 6th Circ. May Resolve District Court TCPA Exception Split" Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) News TCPA Defendant Turns Tables, Scores $2.2M Verdict Against “Lawsuit Factory” Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) News Analysis: Florida Robocall Law Could Bring New Wave Of Litigation Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) News Serial Filer On The Hook For $286K In Defense Costs Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) News TCPA Suits Decline Post-Duguid, But Legislative Initiatives May Expand Liability Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
We Use Cookies to Make your Experience Better

What do we use cookies for?

We use cookies and similar technologies to recognize your repeat visits and preferences, as well as to measure the effectiveness of campaigns and analyze traffic. To learn more about cookies, including how to disable them, view our Cookie Policy. By clicking "I Accept" or "X" on this banner, or using our site, you consent to the use of cookies unless you have disabled them.