October 13, 2020

Clorox Says Label Makes It Clear That Product Doesn’t Disinfect

Clorox says the woman complaining in court that its Splash-Less products aren’t strong enough never bothered reading their labels, according to a report in Legal Newsline. The suit filed in August in a California federal court, complaining that Splash-Less gel-like bleach doesn’t disinfect or protect against COVID-19.

In their response to the suit, Clorox pointed out that, “the Splash-Less label at issue, in contrast to the Regular-Bleach label, made no disinfection or sanitization claim— dooming plaintiff’s theory that Clorox affirmatively misrepresented the properties of the Splash-Less product.” 

News OPINION: “COVID Recovery Shouldn’t Include Frivolous Antibusiness Lawsuits” COVID-19 Liability News Plaintiff Hasn’t Said He Used Hand Sanitizer He’s Suing Over, CVS Says Class Action Litigation, COVID-19 Liability News, Video Summit 2020: Future in Focus - Video Showcase Class Action Litigation, Over-Enforcement News New Study Shows Small Businesses Shoulder Disproportionate Amount Of Commercial Tort Costs Class Action Litigation Press Release New Study: Lawsuit System Costs Small Businesses $182 Billion Class Action Litigation, COVID-19 Liability
We use cookies to make your experience better:
View Our Privacy Policy