January 30, 2020

11th Circ. Decision Narrows Autodialer Decision

A three-judge panel on the Eleventh Circuit issued what one lawyer called “probably the most significant [Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)] decision in a while” by taking a narrower definition of what constitutes an autodialer, Law360 reports.

In the case, the Hilton hotel company said the calls in question did not amount to a violation because they targeted a specific list of prospective customers. The decision, which is in line with the D.C. Circuit and the Third Circuit, said that the technology must both “store” and “produce” phone numbers to constitute an illegal autodialer, meaning the company would have had to create and store the list of phone numbers randomly and without human intervention.

Becca Wahlquist, a TCPA defense attorney, said the decision may “walk back where the expansion has happened to bring it back to the TCPA’s legislative intent.”

News "How 6th Circ. May Resolve District Court TCPA Exception Split" Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) News TCPA Defendant Turns Tables, Scores $2.2M Verdict Against “Lawsuit Factory” Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) News Analysis: Florida Robocall Law Could Bring New Wave Of Litigation Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) News Serial Filer On The Hook For $286K In Defense Costs Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) News TCPA Suits Decline Post-Duguid, But Legislative Initiatives May Expand Liability Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA)
We Use Cookies to Make your Experience Better

What do we use cookies for?

We use cookies and similar technologies to recognize your repeat visits and preferences, as well as to measure the effectiveness of campaigns and analyze traffic. To learn more about cookies, including how to disable them, view our Cookie Policy. By clicking "I Accept" or "X" on this banner, or using our site, you consent to the use of cookies unless you have disabled them.